14 ms·
"a Twitter clone with no upside to writers" Notes linking to Substack Newsletters should convert better. Notes are networked "post summaries" that represent an
by shanebellone 4y ago
"a Twitter clone with no upside to writers"
Notes linking to Substack Newsletters should convert better. Notes are networked "post summaries" that represent an improvement over the traditional blog homepage format. I see a play that could improve what they're cloning while also benefiting their core offering.
It has potential but the likeness of the clone is a bit off-putting for me.
- sf_rob 4y agoYour post clarified my thinking on this. If I think of Notes as a Twitter clone then I'm upset because, like the parent poster, I want a much narrower subscription-base for long form content than I do short form content. However, if I think of this as merely a short form update from accounts I follow then it's fine. That said, Substack showing writers adjacent to your subscriptions in Notes makes if feel more Twitter-like in a way that I'm not sure I like.
- shanebellone 4y ago"However, if I think of this as merely a short form update from accounts I follow then it's fine." Substack will need to decide if they view Notes as a search engine with an RSS feed or a standalone social network. Edit: I don't think their positioning is obvious yet.