3 ms·
Interesting headline. But the content doesn’t seem to argue from a game-theoretic perspective. What signifies a game-theoretic optimum is that no individual pla
by bjornsing 4y ago
Interesting headline. But the content doesn’t seem to argue from a game-theoretic perspective. What signifies a game-theoretic optimum is that no individual player can improve their outcome by changing strategy. The OP seems to think what’s good for users is a game-theoretic optimum. It’s usually not.
- usui 4y agoI agree, I was interested in learning how open-source would be an optimal strategy for AI model designers from a game theory perspective. The post barely had any of that, with weak justifications for its assertions. For that matter, I would have a hard time believing it is an optimal strategy anyway