23 ms·

I mean LOL at comparing citations. http://libgen.rs/search.php?req=Arthur+R.+Jensen&column=author http://libgen.rs/search.php?req=Arthur+R.+Jensen&column=auth..

• runarberg 3y ago
  Sorry, I said n citations, but I meant to say, has been cited n times. But honestly it raises no red flags that Jensen is the face of “modern IQ research”? His most influential work was from the 80s and the 90s, and was heavily criticized at the time (including by Gould). Since than there has been a revolution in non-linear statistics, are you satisfied that “modern IQ research” is basically the same stuff they were doing in the 70s? I mean even General relativity has evolved significantly with since the 70s as new technology becomes available to measure old predictions. Do you honestly think it is a sign of a healthy scientific theory that after a revolution in machine learning, they are still using same old factor analysis to back up their constructs?