The second is clearly the human, as ChatGPT will not be so daring as not to translate absolutely everything it can including "Revue de Fossiles". The human wri

The second is clearly the human, as ChatGPT will not be so daring as not to translate absolutely everything it can including "Revue de Fossiles". The human writing flows better for the most part, although I like the second paragraph ChatGPT wrote, esp "presently we are a pair". But in terms of being a functional translation, ChatGPT is fully adequate. I have used it a lot for this purpose, from many languages, and never found it to be less than accurate. You can also tweak the tone of voice and many other things with simple English requests. This puts it generations ahead of existing tools like Google Translate, and imho puts it into the class of technologies that are close enough to perfect that they will be hard to ever replace.