3 ms·

Are you seriously saying wikipedia was a failed project? Unlike wikipedia, with AI there is a threshold where it can start improving itself entering self impro

Are you seriously saying wikipedia was a failed project? Unlike wikipedia, with AI there is a threshold where it can start improving itself entering self improvement loop. Similar to how computers can improve next generations of computers (with a lot of human effort) AI can improve AI at some point (with minimal or no human effort).

notahacker 4y ago
No, I'm seriously saying that Wikipedia is moderately useful provided you don't trust its answers too much, and stopped improving in quality fairly early on and is now merely bigger than it was. So as an analogy, it strongly favours the people arguing in favour of diminishing returns to improvements.