This feels like some kind of the opposite of the sunk costs fallacy. Like a “past gains” fallacy. None of those good things magically disappear if Elon fails i

This feels like some kind of the opposite of the sunk costs fallacy. Like a “past gains” fallacy. None of those good things magically disappear if Elon fails in his Twitter purchase or changes. Those past gains have already happened. If your argument was forward looking it would make more sense to me (if he fails with this Twitter program, he won’t be able to deliver Starship which would be bad because XYZ; or it would impact his ability to continue Tesla forward because ABC). I don’t know that I agree with the forward looking argument, but it seems more sound to me than the backward looking argument.