> Well there's quite a lot here that's just flat wrong, but you get the gist of some of it. If you're going to be condescending the least you could do is be co

> Well there's quite a lot here that's just flat wrong, but you get the gist of some of it. If you're going to be condescending the least you could do is be correct. > Computers can't pass turing tests because the answer is divergent, or in other words has multiple possible answers. This is wrong. Computers can absolutely pass Turing tests; an obvious example is ChatGPT. Not sure what you mean by divergent, to my knowledge it's not a technical term in this context. Given that you use it as an explanation for an obviously false statement I'm not going to even try and interpret it. I've seen you arguing in with other people this thread. Instead of claiming that others have no credibility you should instead examine your own. FYI, probabilistic Turing machines and Turing machines are the same in the same way that Javascript and Java are the same.