4 ms·
Obviously not. Why would you think so? You're only liable for the software shared under a support agreement. I feel people really try to pick the worst possibl
by ginko 4y ago
Obviously not. Why would you think so? You're only liable for the software shared under a support agreement.
I feel people really try to pick the worst possible interpretation of these laws just so they can hate on the EU.
- LolWolf 4y agounfortunately lawyers (et al) will similarly pick the worst possible interpretation of a law as needed to win a case
- codeflo 4y agoNo, it’s people who possibly even agree with the intention of this wanting the letter of the law to be as clear as possible — so that a hypothetical uninformed judge a few years down the road has less wiggle room for a bad decision. (Also note that in some European law traditions, written law is more important than case law.)
- croes 4y ago> free and open-source software developed or supplied outside the course of a commercial activity What is software in this case? The open source software you developed as such or only the Installations you sold support for?
- lozenge 4y agoBut the whole point of the CRA is to increase cybersecurity even without a support agreement. Eg every device to receive 5 years security support.