4 ms·
> I liked that I could boot directly to a console and then run the GUI only if I wanted to. You can do that in Linux... > Only I'm not sure I'd be able to use
by okasaki 4y ago
> I liked that I could boot directly to a console and then run the GUI only if I wanted to.
You can do that in Linux...
> Only I'm not sure I'd be able to use it as a daily driver. I felt like I'd be spending my time administering the machine and nothing else.
Not really? I think the BSDs are simpler, change less and are better documented.
Source: I ran OpenBSD on desktops in early 2000s.
- hulitu 4y ago> I think the BSDs are simpler, change less and are better documented > Source: I ran OpenBSD on desktops in early 2000s. From my experience witb BSDs on a SUN pizza box (also around 2000) : FreeBSD had the docs on the internet, not very helpful when you want to configure the network. OpenBSD was ok. Linux (my first choice) was slow as hell.
- jmort253 4y ago> You can do that in Linux... I think I _may_ have done that before. What I thought was interesting is FreeBSD just did that without any extra steps. When I "apt-get install" a desktop environment in Ubuntu or Debian and reboot, the desktop environment loads by default. In FreeBSD, I guess there's some startup scripts I would need to edit to start X and the desktop manager...
- okasaki 4y agoYeah, Debian will auto-configure that for you. Distros like Arch do not. Well, it depends on what you install. If you install just xorg and a window manager, it usually won't boot into it. If you install GNOME or KDE that ship with a display manager, it will be configured to boot into it. That is what you would usually want though.
- RealStickman_ 4y agoYou can just disable the login manager on Debian and you'll start at the TTY every time.