2 ms·
I find that Claude is more conversational (better fine tuning), but not as smart as even ChatGPT. Prompt: The original titles and release years in the Harry
by dTal 4y ago
I find that Claude is more conversational (better fine tuning), but not as smart as even ChatGPT.
Prompt:
The original titles and release years in the Harry Potter series are:
Philosopher's Stone (1997)
Chamber of Secrets (1998)
Prisoner of Azkaban (1999)
Goblet of Fire (2000)
Order of the Phoenix (2003)
Half-Blood Prince (2005)
Deathly Hallows (2007)
Given this, generate a new Harry Potter title, using only the words found in the existing titles. Avoid orderings in the original titles. You may add or remove plurals and possessives.
Results:
ChatGPT: Blood Chamber of the Phoenix's Prisoner
Claude-instant: Chamber Prince Half-Blood Phoenix
- dr_dshiv 4y agoThe question for me is whether they understand complex concepts and can apply them in new areas. So when I’m doing quantum computing work, I go back and forth between Claude and GPT4 and both complement the other very well.
- phillipcarter 4y agoI find the opposite, claude-instant seems to generally give me better results for my use case. FWIW gpt-3.5-turbo is good too, just not quite as good.
- kalkin 4y agoChatGPT is more comparable to what Quora/Poe calls Claude+ - slower/more expensive/smarter. Claude-instant is closer to GPT-turbo in that tradeoff space.
- dTal 4y agoBoth bots are free on poe.com, so one is not more expensive than the other.