4 ms·
I find the proposed changes a bit disingenious. The gist is that Stallman should hand over the FSF franchise, to some unspecified persons, with free rein to do
by m000 4y ago
I find the proposed changes a bit disingenious. The gist is that Stallman should hand over the FSF franchise, to some unspecified persons, with free rein to do whatever they want with it, as long as it is loosely relevant with free software.
It's only natural that Stallman will refuse, and I can't blame him for that.
I mean, why not start your own "Libre Software Foundation" and get those unnamed "emerging leaders" behind your agenda? Why would you need to be the continuation of FSF if you plan to radically change it?
- kentrado 4y agoI think you are correct. It seems to me to be a power struggle disguised as something that should be done for the good of the FOSS movement.