3 ms·
In the original tweet, they say: > we invite you to review (..) and share any feedback (...). Your responses will help us ensure the Rust Trademark Policy is u
by serial_dev 3y ago
In the original tweet, they say:
> we invite you to review (..) and share any feedback (...). Your responses will help us ensure the Rust Trademark Policy is useful for all!
I'm bringing attention and visibility to the proposal and hopefully help the foundation receive valuable feedback from more people.
- hobofan 3y agoYes, and you are doing so on a post about a random project written in Rust, which doesn't have anything to do with the policy proposal that just happens to be under review during the same time. This just diverts attention away from the original project that was posted here. Are you going to post the same thing under every project written in Rust during the next weeks?
- NoraCodes 3y agoSure. They provide a form for that, and there are discussion threads in many places. Commenting vitriol on random projects that are, in fact, totally unrelated to the Rust Foundation is not productive.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- serial_dev 3y agoI'm sorry if you took my comment as vitriol, it's not meant to be that, it was a light-hearted joke. The proposal was very disappointing to me, and it has been on top of my mind when I browsed HN this morning, so when I saw a cool project that -- if some of the sections of the proposal go through -- would violate Rust's Trademark Policy, I thought it'd be acceptable to bring that up (and still think that). I believe raising awareness to issues with the proposal is productive, and hopefully at least some people here on HN decided to leave feedback in the Rust Foundation's form, so that as little of the non-sensical paragraphs stay in the final document as possible.