4 ms·
> The content for this site is CC-BY-SA. The code for this site is MIT. This made me laugh a bit, given the arguments being made. (I'm not calling him a hypoc
by appleflaxen 4y ago
> The content for this site is CC-BY-SA. The code for this site is MIT.
This made me laugh a bit, given the arguments being made.
(I'm not calling him a hypocrite; it's fine to use MIT licenses and make these arguments. It was just a funny concluding statement on the blog page)
- ninjin 4y agoDrew is known to use everything from MIT to AGPL depending on what he thinks serves the given software best (heck, Hare has a rather complex mixture of licenses [1]). I have in the past disagreed with these decisions, but I think pointing out the licensing choice for his website code is a bit of a distraction. [1]: https://sr.ht/~sircmpwn/hare/#licensing https://sr.ht/~sircmpwn/hare/#licensing