5 ms·

"Dario Amodei, the former VP of research at OpenAI, launched Anthropic in 2021 as a public benefit corporation, taking with him a number of OpenAI employees, in

by dpflan 4y ago

"Dario Amodei, the former VP of research at OpenAI, launched Anthropic in 2021 as a public benefit corporation, taking with him a number of OpenAI employees, including OpenAI’s former policy lead Jack Clark. Amodei split from OpenAI after a disagreement over the company’s direction, namely the startup’s increasingly commercial focus." So Anthropic is the Google-supported equivalent of OpenAI? Isn't the founder going to run into the same issues as before (commercialization at OpenAI)? How does Google not use Anthropic as either something commercial or nice marketing material for its AI offerings?

potamic 4y ago
What does a policy lead do and how are they relevant to an early stage startup? I would be more interested in seeing which researchers and engineers join.
- iandanforth 4y ago
  Jack is pretty well known in the community since he runs not only the Import AI newsletter, but also has been a partner in the AI Index report. He also has a media background so is generally well connected even beyond his influential reach. Also, though not relevant to your question, he's a really nice guy :)
- neuronexmachina 4y ago
  I assume it's basically this position: https://thriveml.com/jobs/product-policy-lead-e296c565 https://thriveml.com/jobs/product-policy-lead-e296c565 > As the Product Policy Lead, you will set the foundation for Anthropic’s approach to safe deployments. You will develop the policies that govern the use of our systems, oversee the technical approaches to identifying current and future risks, and build the organizational capacity to mitigate product safety risks at-scale. You will work collaboratively with our Product, Societal Impacts, Policy, Legal, and leadership teams to develop policies and processes that protect Anthropic and our partners. > You’re a great fit for the role if you’ve served in leadership positions in the fields of Trust & Safety, product policy, or risk management at fast-growing technology companies, and you recognize that emerging technology such as generative AI systems will require creative approaches to mitigating complex threats. > Please note that in this role you may encounter sensitive material and subject matter, including policy issues that may be offensive or upsetting.
naillo 4y ago
More like FTX-supported. They got half a billion in investment from them according to an earlier blog post by Anthropic.
- samwillis 4y ago
  I believe I read somewhere that that investment may have to be returned.
  - speed_spread 4y ago
    Hence the race to an AI smart enough to figure out a way to keep the money.
  - ac29 4y ago
    The article says the shares are expected to be sold as part of the FTX bankruptcy process.
rebolek 4y ago
There may have been a disagreement, but now they're focused on profit, as everybody else. From the same article: “Anthropic has been heavily focused on research for the first year and a half of its existence, but we have been convinced of the necessity of commercialization, which we fully committed to in September [2022],” the pitch deck reads. “We’ve developed a strategy for go-to-market and initial product specialization that fits with our core expertise, brand and where we see adoption occurring over the next 12 months.”
- dpflan 4y ago
  This is hilarious to me, in that the disgruntled departure just did a 180… how long until the next disgruntled spin-out for higher reasons chases the dollar too…
  - lelanthran 4y ago
    > This is hilarious to me, in that the disgruntled departure just did a 180… how long until the next disgruntled spin-out for higher reasons chases the dollar too… The cynic in me wants to ask "What makes you think his departure was because of an anti-commercialisation position?" My take (probably just as wrong as everybody's else take) is that he saw the huge commercialisation potential and realised that he could make even more money by having a larger stake, which he got when he started his own venture.
    - wittenbunk 4y ago
      If you look read the parent comment in this thread you'd get an answer...
      - lelanthran 4y ago
        > If you look read the parent comment in this thread you'd get an answer... I looked and I didn't get an answer. hence my comment. To clarify, we know what he said his reason was, we don't know if that really was his reason. When people leave they very rarely voice the actual reason for leaving; the reason they give is designed to make them look as good as possible for any future employer or venture.
jjtheblunt 4y ago
Curiously, Anthropic.com was launched in 2021, but a small custom software shop in Arizona around since the mid-late 90s had registered and been using Anthropic.ai in 2020 for a couple projects. How does that name collision work?
- nr2x 4y ago
  “Hi we’re here to save humanity, and we’re stealing your name! We have a ton of lawyers, buckets of cash from Google to hire more lawyers, and if you don’t like it, you’re fucked. Now please enjoy being saved by us.”
- dan-robertson 4y ago
  Maybe they bought the domain name for a mutually agreeable price?
  - jjtheblunt 4y ago
    It's the trademark that matters i thought (possibly naively), since anthropic.ai was registered in 2020 for a product built in 2019, it seems, and the Anthropic spin off from OpenAI was formed in 2021, seems to have purchased a squatted domain name of anthropic.com then. Kind of unsure how it all works.
    - dan-robertson 4y ago
      Well you can also buy a trademark, right? Though I think different companies are allowed the same trademarks if the things being trademarked aren’t confusable
RC_ITR 4y ago
>So Anthropic is the Google-supported equivalent of OpenAI? Isn't the founder going to run into the same issues as before (commercialization at OpenAI)? How does Google not use Anthropic as either something commercial or nice marketing material for its AI offerings? I think the unstated shift that has happened in the past few years is that we've gone from researchers thinking about Fourier transforms to efficiently encode positional data into vectors to researchers thinking about how to train a model with a 100k+ token batch size on a super-computer-like cluster of GPUs. I can totally see why people believed the math could be done in a non-profit way, I do not see how the systems engineering could be.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
two_in_one 4y ago
"public benefit".. Ah, they are so good. May be they will _open_ something after all.. ;)
- EntrePrescott 4y ago
  yeah, LOL on that. Their idea of "public benefit" is of course that they benefit publicly, though for marketing purposes "public benefit" sounds nicer (just like the "Open" in "ClosedAI") because people would tend to emotionally associate something nicer with it. Reminds me of the (possibly LLM-generated) marketing tirade of a voice faking text-to-speech service recently here on hn, which ended with: "We are thrilled to be sharing our new model, and look forward to feedback!": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35328698 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35328698 … "share" yeah right… like: where can I download the model then? Of course they didn't mean to actually share their model but only to rent out remote access to it, but that doesn't sound as nice as "share".

by dpflan 4y ago

potamic 4y ago

What does a policy lead do and how are they relevant to an early stage startup? I would be more interested in seeing which researchers and engineers join.

iandanforth 4y ago
Jack is pretty well known in the community since he runs not only the Import AI newsletter, but also has been a partner in the AI Index report. He also has a media background so is generally well connected even beyond his influential reach. Also, though not relevant to your question, he's a really nice guy :)
neuronexmachina 4y ago
I assume it's basically this position: https://thriveml.com/jobs/product-policy-lead-e296c565 https://thriveml.com/jobs/product-policy-lead-e296c565 > As the Product Policy Lead, you will set the foundation for Anthropic’s approach to safe deployments. You will develop the policies that govern the use of our systems, oversee the technical approaches to identifying current and future risks, and build the organizational capacity to mitigate product safety risks at-scale. You will work collaboratively with our Product, Societal Impacts, Policy, Legal, and leadership teams to develop policies and processes that protect Anthropic and our partners. > You’re a great fit for the role if you’ve served in leadership positions in the fields of Trust & Safety, product policy, or risk management at fast-growing technology companies, and you recognize that emerging technology such as generative AI systems will require creative approaches to mitigating complex threats. > Please note that in this role you may encounter sensitive material and subject matter, including policy issues that may be offensive or upsetting.

naillo 4y ago

More like FTX-supported. They got half a billion in investment from them according to an earlier blog post by Anthropic.

samwillis 4y ago
I believe I read somewhere that that investment may have to be returned.
- speed_spread 4y ago
  Hence the race to an AI smart enough to figure out a way to keep the money.
- ac29 4y ago
  The article says the shares are expected to be sold as part of the FTX bankruptcy process.

rebolek 4y ago

There may have been a disagreement, but now they're focused on profit, as everybody else. From the same article: “Anthropic has been heavily focused on research for the first year and a half of its existence, but we have been convinced of the necessity of commercialization, which we fully committed to in September [2022],” the pitch deck reads. “We’ve developed a strategy for go-to-market and initial product specialization that fits with our core expertise, brand and where we see adoption occurring over the next 12 months.”

dpflan 4y ago
This is hilarious to me, in that the disgruntled departure just did a 180… how long until the next disgruntled spin-out for higher reasons chases the dollar too…
- lelanthran 4y ago
  > This is hilarious to me, in that the disgruntled departure just did a 180… how long until the next disgruntled spin-out for higher reasons chases the dollar too… The cynic in me wants to ask "What makes you think his departure was because of an anti-commercialisation position?" My take (probably just as wrong as everybody's else take) is that he saw the huge commercialisation potential and realised that he could make even more money by having a larger stake, which he got when he started his own venture.
  - wittenbunk 4y ago
    If you look read the parent comment in this thread you'd get an answer...
    - lelanthran 4y ago
      > If you look read the parent comment in this thread you'd get an answer... I looked and I didn't get an answer. hence my comment. To clarify, we know what he said his reason was, we don't know if that really was his reason. When people leave they very rarely voice the actual reason for leaving; the reason they give is designed to make them look as good as possible for any future employer or venture.

jjtheblunt 4y ago

Curiously, Anthropic.com was launched in 2021, but a small custom software shop in Arizona around since the mid-late 90s had registered and been using Anthropic.ai in 2020 for a couple projects. How does that name collision work?

nr2x 4y ago
“Hi we’re here to save humanity, and we’re stealing your name! We have a ton of lawyers, buckets of cash from Google to hire more lawyers, and if you don’t like it, you’re fucked. Now please enjoy being saved by us.”
dan-robertson 4y ago
Maybe they bought the domain name for a mutually agreeable price?
- jjtheblunt 4y ago
  It's the trademark that matters i thought (possibly naively), since anthropic.ai was registered in 2020 for a product built in 2019, it seems, and the Anthropic spin off from OpenAI was formed in 2021, seems to have purchased a squatted domain name of anthropic.com then. Kind of unsure how it all works.
  - dan-robertson 4y ago
    Well you can also buy a trademark, right? Though I think different companies are allowed the same trademarks if the things being trademarked aren’t confusable

RC_ITR 4y ago

>So Anthropic is the Google-supported equivalent of OpenAI? Isn't the founder going to run into the same issues as before (commercialization at OpenAI)? How does Google not use Anthropic as either something commercial or nice marketing material for its AI offerings? I think the unstated shift that has happened in the past few years is that we've gone from researchers thinking about Fourier transforms to efficiently encode positional data into vectors to researchers thinking about how to train a model with a 100k+ token batch size on a super-computer-like cluster of GPUs. I can totally see why people believed the math could be done in a non-profit way, I do not see how the systems engineering could be.

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

two_in_one 4y ago

"public benefit".. Ah, they are so good. May be they will _open_ something after all.. ;)

EntrePrescott 4y ago
yeah, LOL on that. Their idea of "public benefit" is of course that they benefit publicly, though for marketing purposes "public benefit" sounds nicer (just like the "Open" in "ClosedAI") because people would tend to emotionally associate something nicer with it. Reminds me of the (possibly LLM-generated) marketing tirade of a voice faking text-to-speech service recently here on hn, which ended with: "We are thrilled to be sharing our new model, and look forward to feedback!": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35328698 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35328698 … "share" yeah right… like: where can I download the model then? Of course they didn't mean to actually share their model but only to rent out remote access to it, but that doesn't sound as nice as "share".