And the OP article is plagiarized from Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/legal/theranos-founder-elizabeth-holmes-cannot-remain-free-during-appeal-judge-rules-20

And the OP article is plagiarized from Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/legal/theranos-founder-elizabeth-holmes-cannot-remain-free-during-appeal-judge-rules-2023-04-11/ https://www.reuters.com/legal/theranos-founder-elizabeth-hol... -- "A federal judge has denied a request to release Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes from prison while she appeals her fraud conviction" <=> "A U.S. judge on Monday denied Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes' request to remain free on bail while she appeals her conviction on charges of defrauding..." -- "Holmes was sentenced to 11 years and three months in prison in November for defrauding investors..." <=> "U.S. District Judge Edward Davila sentenced Holmes to 11 years and three months in prison in November" -- "He noted that even if Holmes won her appeal challenging the admission of evidence about Theranos’ inaccurate blood tests, it would not result in a reversal of the other convictions against her" <=> "Davila concluded that even if Holmes won her appeal to challenge the Theranos technology evidence, it wouldn't result in a reversal or a new trial of all the counts she was found guilty of" Etc. (this is just 3 of the first 4 sentences!) The little anti-string-matching substitutions, like "to challenge" -> "challenging", show clear intent to obfuscate.