> For a $1T org like Amazon, these are distractions. Even trying to transfer it is a distraction; it wouldn't move the revenue needle. It makes sense. Not wron

> For a $1T org like Amazon, these are distractions. Even trying to transfer it is a distraction; it wouldn't move the revenue needle. It makes sense. Not wrong, but on the flip side how much of a financial drag is operating it really? Are they that hard up for cash that the low margins (or even loss) of this property makes a meaningful difference?