> I think it says just as much to reject a theory without proof as it does to present a theory without proof. Except you don't have any proof, and the proof t

> I think it says just as much to reject a theory without proof as it does to present a theory without proof. Except you don't have any proof, and the proof that opposes your wild speculation is: - 5 years ago, a bug was opened on the FF issue tracker that over the years had a bunch of derailments. - A month ago, someone _actually_ investigated, found an issue and reported it to Microsoft. - Issue was promptly fixed You're spreading FUD, and attacking _me_ for asking for proof when you made the accusation in the first place. If you want to discuss this reasonably, I'm happy to, but in order to do that, the slightest modicum of bait that points to any sort of effort is required, meanwhile to someone who has worked on software for a reasonably long time, seeing issues spin like this for years is par for the course, and it's great that someone fixed it.