> Does it need proof? Yes, it does. Stringing together a narrative and ignoring the proof that contridts your claims is conspiracy theory territory. > Someone

> Does it need proof? Yes, it does. Stringing together a narrative and ignoring the proof that contridts your claims is conspiracy theory territory. > Someone can make a statement like this solely based upon past behavior. Yet all the evidence (the bug linked) implies nothing of the sort. > They're merely stating that it is plausible. I can state that it's _plausible_ that the US government conspired with Disney to fake the Moon landing as a show of power to the USSR in the 60's, but I'd expect to be asked for proof, and I'd expect to be accused of spreading absolute nonsense.