I don't think the training data has works of centuries-old translators. > If you don’t know how every token of input affects the output, is engineering an accu

I don't think the training data has works of centuries-old translators. > If you don’t know how every token of input affects the output, is engineering an accurate way to describe what you’re doing? We in fact don't know exactly. Prompt engineering seems to be a bag of tricks that change the probabilities of outputs. But I didn't invent the term.