4 ms·
From the article: "Although Tesla represents to customers "that its camera recordings cannot be linked to individuals and their vehicles," the Tesla system "was
by BurnGpuBurn 4y ago
From the article: "Although Tesla represents to customers "that its camera recordings cannot be linked to individuals and their vehicles," the Tesla system "was, in fact, capable of—and did—show the location of recordings, meaning anyone viewing the videos and images could determine exactly where the Tesla owner lived, i.e., who the Tesla owner was," the lawsuit said."
And that is exactly what people should remember vividly about this. Whatever a company tells you regarding privacy, it is almost always a big fat LIE. Yet somehow when one accuses companies like this of illegal data collection there's an army of Tesla defenders demanding proof. Well, here it is. Remember it, it will be viable as long as this company exists.
- Ekaros 4y agoAnd this is why the GDPR is so wide. And really so many things can be PII. On individual level yes, location might not identify a person, but with enough data of it combined with other data it can. Enforcement might be lacking, but at least the intent does make sense each time you hear about cases like this.