5 ms·

ChatGPT is more akin a demo of what GPT4 can do, not a real product. To really get good and interesting content out of it, you need to use the API where you hav

ChatGPT is more akin a demo of what GPT4 can do, not a real product. To really get good and interesting content out of it, you need to use the API where you have better control of the various parameters like the temperature and the system prompt. The ChatGPT system prompt is boring, so the replies you get from ChatGPT are boring as well.

courseofaction 4y ago
Early content generation before the RLHF safety tuning was a lot more interesting and nuanced. It's significantly worse now, both dumber and less diverse output. [1] We're seeing the enshittification of early AI products in real time, presumably so they can be sold to the lowest common denominator who can't distinguish AI output from human-embodied thought and opinion, and so that companies like micro$oft can safely sell advertising space in/alongside it, or whatever their plan is. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbIk7-JPB2c https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbIk7-JPB2c - mentioned fairly early in the talk that the "sparks of AGI" are not reproducible with the release version of GPT4.