4 ms·
> Additionally, the promise of "No AI-Content" appears to be snake oil unless the creators have discovered a magic formula for reliably distinguishing AI output
by marginalia_nu 4y ago
> Additionally, the promise of "No AI-Content" appears to be snake oil unless the creators have discovered a magic formula for reliably distinguishing AI output from human output. With up to 7 degrees of separation, your search network is pretty much guaranteed to include AI-generated content, which will be indexed like any other content.
You can fairly effectively apply network topology heuristics to the link graph to separate the wheat from the chaff. Content farms tend to have different linking patterns from organic content. (Overall, few humans tend to link to them)
- JohnFen 4y agoThat lets you exclude most content farms, but doesn't do anything about AI generated content.
- marginalia_nu 4y agoIt's more or less the same thing.
- p-e-w 4y agoNo. Many high-quality websites contain AI-generated content. Illustrations made with Stable Diffusion have become common on hacker/dev blogs. AI-generated text is posted everywhere ChatGPT is being discussed. The technique you describe doesn't filter any of those. So "No AI-Content" is at best highly misleading, and, if you're being a little less charitable, flat out false.
- JohnFen 4y agoI hope that's true. If it's just content farms that are affected, I'd be fine. My concern is that it will happen beyond them.