5 ms·
This article is link-bait, but I'll bite. Simply put, Gmail provides a compelling user experience: * fast and accurate search. This is key, and I don't know o
by emu 15y ago
This article is link-bait, but I'll bite.
Simply put, Gmail provides a compelling user experience:
* fast and accurate search. This is key, and I don't know of a single desktop email client that even comes close to providing a decent search feature. Decent here means "answer full-text queries accurately within a second or so". I didn't realize how useful this was until switching to Gmail; now I have it, I can't switch back. I don't even bother organizing my email more than a minimal amount any more, I just search for things when I need them.
* remote access is also key. I regularly access the internet from at least 4 different devices, on at least 3 different operating systems. Sometimes I do so while traveling. Gmail makes this convenient --- all I need is a web browser. IMAP need not apply --- I found IMAP appallingly slow last time I tried it.
- dangrossman 15y agoI use Rackspace Email, over IMAP on the desktop, IMAP on my phone, and webmail when on someone else's computer. It's never slow in any way. When I sign up for things, I hear the ding of the confirmation e-mail within 2-3 seconds of submitting the form -- fast as push mail.
- sdkmvx 15y agoIt's using IMAP IDLE (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMAP_IDLE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMAP_IDLE), which is push email.
- gala8y 15y ago> This is key, and I don't know of a single desktop email client that even comes close to providing a decent search feature. I used to use Opera M2 built-in client and think it's even faster than Gmail web UI and very accurate.
- nknight 15y ago> This article is link-bait You should probably check out who Harald Welte is and what he does before making such accusations. I don't agree with him here, but "link bait" this is not.
- nirvdrum 15y agoMy experience is the polar opposite. I have to rely on a native client to search because GMail search is so bad. It hasn't been that fast for a while -- waiting 30+s for a search is pretty routine nowadays. But worse, it's never really handled stemming well -- it has to be an exact word match, even for singular vs plural. And the number of false positives I get usually doesn't even make it worthwhile. I had resorted to deleting mail rather than archiving it, but that only helped marginally. Having said that, I rely on too many marketplace apps now to make switching a reasonable alternative. So, I make do with native clients.
- evilduck 15y ago30s searches....I've gotta ask, how many gigabytes of email do you have? I've got about 3 and mine come back in less than a second.
- nirvdrum 15y agoOne account has 2.5 GB, another has 700 MB. I'm on a lot of mailing lists and get a lot of transactional email. I just timed switching a label and that took 4s on the smaller account. This is in Chrome with SPDY enabled, too, so I doubt it's client transport. I should probably note that it tends to be variable with the time of day. That's not unexpected, but still kinda sucks.
- gavinlynch 15y agoI have almost 2.5 GB's and also have zero problems with GMail's default search. Comes back in less than a second.
- nirvdrum 15y agoMaybe it's number of messages vs size of store. Or perhaps because a large percentage are similar in structure (google groups, monit alerts, etc.), they cause indexing to perform poorly. Dunno. But I wish I had < 1s searches.