Meh. After reading both the linked page and this link[1] that someone else posted in this thread, I definitely agree with this take from the latter: > After re

Meh. After reading both the linked page and this link[1] that someone else posted in this thread, I definitely agree with this take from the latter: > After reading his article, it is safe to say that Horgan does not have the first clue about scientific skepticism. The result was a parade of straw men supported by cherry picked and often misinterpreted examples. I don't see obnoxious counter-attacks, I see people correctly pointing out that he's wrong. [1]: https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/john-horgan-is-skeptical-of-skeptics/ https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/john-horgan-is...