I did not use the word "proves"; the "exception to the rule" fallacy is when you see a singular case violating some rule and you use that to assume the rule doe

I did not use the word "proves"; the "exception to the rule" fallacy is when you see a singular case violating some rule and you use that to assume the rule doesn't hold in general, or you make generalizations from a singular case. The commenter I'm replying to is advocating for homeo- / naturo-pathy because of some statistically insignificant and probably actually not causally based relationship they've witnessed, which is generalizing from a ~singular case