4 ms·
We cannot give meaning to tools, guns are much of a shortcut in that regard and nobody bats an eye. Schizo's tried to kill the curl creator because he was in h
by tough 4y ago
We cannot give meaning to tools, guns are much of a shortcut in that regard and nobody bats an eye.
Schizo's tried to kill the curl creator because he was in his software everywhere and so spying on them... People is complicated.
Let's not buy the bait that can kill wonderful tech, I agree the potential for harm is there, but I wouldn't blame the knive when a junkie stabs you to buy some heroin with what the gets out of you.
- danpalmer 4y agoI don't disagree with you, but it's also important that there is accountability. There is currently little accountability with LLMs. One could argue that the user should be accountable, but that doesn't account for how an LLM is trained. A user should clearly not be held accountable for being harmed if using an LLM maliciously trained to harm users. Most legal systems punish negligence in a position of power, so it stands to reason that the creator of an LLM should bear some responsibility for its behaviour. It is not yet clear to me how accountability should be portioned out to the user, operator, publisher, trainer, and model creator, but my feeling is that all bear at least some responsibility for its use.