3 ms·
I believe you are arguing semantics. I am arguing that it’s fair. Whether it’s Fox News or Washing Post. If they receive govt funding, it should be labeled as
by codeddesign 3y ago
I believe you are arguing semantics.
I am arguing that it’s fair. Whether it’s Fox News or Washing Post. If they receive govt funding, it should be labeled as per Twitter terms.
The title of the label is a different discussion in which I agree with your last sentence.
- Timon3 3y agoI'm not arguing semantics in any way. Hypocrisy isn't a semantic problem. You, on the other hand, are literally arguing semantics, since you're ignoring Twitters own definition, and just going by colloquial meanings. > If they receive govt funding, it should be labeled as per Twitter terms. I fully agree, they should be labeled as per Twitter terms. The Twitter terms clearly stated that NPR was not an example of state-affiliated media. It's problematic that Twitter labeled in a way contrary to their terms.