4 ms·
if it's actually "reborn", we can't know, so the question is invalid. Penrose seems to be claiming that there is falsifiable evidence that this "incarnation" i
by markhahn 4y ago
if it's actually "reborn", we can't know, so the question is invalid.
Penrose seems to be claiming that there is falsifiable evidence that this "incarnation" is not the only one. that's totally fringe (speculative).