3 ms·
> He was completely dismissive to the fact that religious people had perfectly predicted that in the absence of religion, people would have the same sort of fer
by ecshafer 4y ago
> He was completely dismissive to the fact that religious people had perfectly predicted that in the absence of religion, people would have the same sort of fervour for superficially rationalistic, but otherwise deranged, views.
Jung and Nietzsche both had this idea ~100 years ago. When Nietzsche claimed God was dead, it was a lamentation, not an enthusiastic assertion, it was the modern world that had killed God. Jung claimed that people that left religions still tied their ideas to something, New Age Religions, Spiritualism, politics, something. In the French Revolution the Cult of Rationality set up by Robespierre had just as many trapping of religion and blood thirsty fanatics as any religion. The cultural revolution in China has many "atheists" gladly pointing people out for "heresy" to the "inquisition".
These is a lot of evidence that religion is not the only source of fanatics out there.
- muyuu 4y agoI believe he was always aware of this, but thought it was different this time because of wide access to information and technology, etc. Reading that, it does sound like a sort of religious belief, but that's how he (Dawkins) had posed it in the past since the 90s or so when questioned about it.
- jhbadger 4y agoRobespierre's cult wasn't based on "reason" but rather was just a normal religion based on a central God and the belief in an immortal soul. It wasn't really all that different from many forms of Protestantism -- he simply wanted to control the religion himself rather than having the Pope do it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_the_Supreme_Being https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_the_Supreme_Being