4 ms·
Reasoning from first principles (physics), there is zero CO2 impact of food, including beef (especially discounting methane). Animals are part of the CO2 cycle
by tomp 4y ago
Reasoning from first principles (physics), there is zero CO2 impact of food, including beef (especially discounting methane).
Animals are part of the CO2 cycle. They breathe out CO2, you eat meat and breath out CO2, grass consumes CO2 to grow, cow eats grass - loop complete.
Of course, there are other inputs - e.g. transportation and fertilizer production (fun fact: 50% of the protein of your body is artificially produced, organic nitrogen bound via Haber-Bosch process).
But those are energy inputs, not CO2 inputs. If we used nuclear/solar, farming would be CO2-neutral.
All long-term climate change impact is coming from fossil fuels, not meat/farming. (Methane has only short-term impact.)
- timeon 4y agoNuclear/solar is not going to solve deforestation.
- tomp 4y agoIt won't, but economic progress will. Most rich countries are increasing forest (reforesting, not deforesting).
- 11235813213455 4y agoit's more like a side-effect of lower fertility, because 1 person in rich country pollutes as much as 40 persons in poor countries