4 ms·
This is a good argument for making real estate ownership temporary and non-inheritable. For a finite resource like land, ownership is literally depriving the la
by bazoom42 4y ago
This is a good argument for making real estate ownership temporary and non-inheritable. For a finite resource like land, ownership is literally depriving the land from everybody else.
Ownership of creative works you create yourself does not deprive anybody else of anything, so is less problematic.
- matheusmoreira 4y agoNo, it's not a good argument for that. Hell yes my ownership of my house deprives others of access to it. Obviously. That's by design and absolutely how things are supposed to be. And you'd have to be a literal communist to believe otherwise. People cannot have my house because I'm living in it, and my family will get my house in the future when I die because they will also be living in it. Because land is real property. Unlike the made up BS that is intellectual property which is just like trying to own numbers.