3 ms·

Sorry for being rude. The above article sounds like written by GPT. Also, the author's tweets look like this: "If you really wanna learn about somebody, skip

Sorry for being rude. The above article sounds like written by GPT. Also, the author's tweets look like this: "If you really wanna learn about somebody, skip the 60 minute interview and have them drive you through New York City for 15 minutes." And then this person calls himself "The Writing Guy" on his twitter bio and unironically sells a writing course.

punnerud 4y ago
ChatGPT/OpenAIs detector does not agree: “The classifier considers the text to be very unlikely AI-generated.” I pasted first half of the article into it. https://platform.openai.com/ai-text-classifier https://platform.openai.com/ai-text-classifier
- suddenclarity 4y ago
  That's the tool that only can correctly classify 26% of AI written text?
- prakhar897 4y ago
  Here's one written by ChatGPT. https://sharegpt.com/c/cjnFahj https://sharegpt.com/c/cjnFahj 2 in the top 5 matches the handwritten article.
zmxz 4y ago
Could you explain how's that related to 51 ideas that are listed on the link? I'm struggling to see the connection you are seeing, can you clarify? Are the ideas mentioned worth less because you found a potential way to discredit the person listing them?
- pcthrowaway 4y ago
  Opportunity cost. We'd do better to discuss something that wasn't GPT vomit. Especially this GPT vomit, which is not very good
  - crhulls 4y ago
    The ideas are simple and not particularly unique, but sometimes a list of simple but not unique ideas, which many of us already know, but nicely articulated in one place, can spark thought. If I took at as a deep philosophical treatise I might agree with you, but that isn’t what it is and I don’t think that makes it vomit.
    - pcthrowaway 4y ago
      These aren't even nicely articulated, they're poorly articulated and full of inaccuracies
      - zmxz 4y ago
        To quote Luke Skywalker: everything you said is wrong
  - zmxz 4y ago
    So what you're saying is that what you wrote is correct and you should be trusted because... of what? Given your nickname and attitude, how does one not conclude you're here to just be negative because you can?

punnerud 4y ago

ChatGPT/OpenAIs detector does not agree: “The classifier considers the text to be very unlikely AI-generated.” I pasted first half of the article into it. https://platform.openai.com/ai-text-classifier https://platform.openai.com/ai-text-classifier

suddenclarity 4y ago
That's the tool that only can correctly classify 26% of AI written text?
prakhar897 4y ago
Here's one written by ChatGPT. https://sharegpt.com/c/cjnFahj https://sharegpt.com/c/cjnFahj 2 in the top 5 matches the handwritten article.

zmxz 4y ago

Could you explain how's that related to 51 ideas that are listed on the link? I'm struggling to see the connection you are seeing, can you clarify? Are the ideas mentioned worth less because you found a potential way to discredit the person listing them?

pcthrowaway 4y ago
Opportunity cost. We'd do better to discuss something that wasn't GPT vomit. Especially this GPT vomit, which is not very good
- crhulls 4y ago
  The ideas are simple and not particularly unique, but sometimes a list of simple but not unique ideas, which many of us already know, but nicely articulated in one place, can spark thought. If I took at as a deep philosophical treatise I might agree with you, but that isn’t what it is and I don’t think that makes it vomit.
  - pcthrowaway 4y ago
    These aren't even nicely articulated, they're poorly articulated and full of inaccuracies
    - zmxz 4y ago
      To quote Luke Skywalker: everything you said is wrong
- zmxz 4y ago
  So what you're saying is that what you wrote is correct and you should be trusted because... of what? Given your nickname and attitude, how does one not conclude you're here to just be negative because you can?