3 ms·
Even though you go on explaining what you mean by "open", seeing that the common definition is "open (source)", I'd go for a different qualifier.
by iamsaitam 4y ago
Even though you go on explaining what you mean by "open", seeing that the common definition is "open (source)", I'd go for a different qualifier.
- 3np 4y agoIt's available under MIT License hosted on GitHub. Am I missing something? https://github.com/brillout/vite-plugin-ssr/blob/main/LICENSE.md https://github.com/brillout/vite-plugin-ssr/blob/main/LICENS...
- brillout 4y agoI think parent means that both Next.js and vite-plugin-ssr are open source, so "open(-source)" isn't a differentiator. I agree although we think we can keep the word "open" and make it clear that we're takling about being a "open framework" (and not only open source).
- brillout 4y agoYea, we've plans to improve communicating that. (Although we do plan to stick to the word "open".)