4 ms·
> Llama is proprietary, the license hasn’t changed. .. assuming that the weights are copyrightable and that you agreed to license them from Meta (fill out the
by Zuiii 4y ago
> Llama is proprietary, the license hasn’t changed.
.. assuming that the weights are copyrightable and that you agreed to license them from Meta (fill out the form). Weights lack at least two requirements to be eligible for copyright protection in the US and many other jurisdictions. For the US, the weights are likely to be considered public domain (unless new legislation is introduced) but we'll have to wait for the courts to know for sure.
- Zuiii 4y ago(Cont.) If you are of the opinion that weights are copyrightable, I encourage you to show how weights satisfy the requirements of copyright - particularly those concerning originality and human authorship - rather than silently downvoting comments you don't like. At least that way would - hopefully - result in a discussion that is far more informative for all of us.
- nailer 4y agoFYI I think you made a good point and I am not silently downvoting you. I feel the same regarding people moderating comments to oblivion because they disagree on HN and have commented about this recently to dang.
- Zuiii 4y agoI should have been more careful with how I wrote my comment. I almost always get silently downvoted when I bring this point up for discussion so I was directing that "you" at those people in particular and not at you. Sorry for coming across as attacking you and thank you for caring about hn.
- nailer 4y agoIt’s OK. Have a happy Easter. :)