> It would also require some kind of a "time police" as well, some kind of a process that would force the event ordering to be causally consistent. If I unders

> It would also require some kind of a "time police" as well, some kind of a process that would force the event ordering to be causally consistent. If I understood the video correctly, there does not exist a time police at all, let alone one that forces things to be out of order (i.e., causality loop), vs in order or visa-versa. If it's ambiguous, then it's not fair to assume that it would cause a paradox any more than it's fair to assume it wouldn't -- and the argument goes that is not evidence for a paradox at all. Again, hammering down on the argument that "here is a just-as-plausible situation in which there would be no paradox -- however specific it might be, therefore we cannot assume there is a paradox necessarily".