4 ms·
Until any of this is codified it seems to be just a glorified "please don't be bad" oped. > You should be protected from abusive data practices via built-in pr
by raidicy 3y ago
Until any of this is codified it seems to be just a glorified "please don't be bad" oped.
> You should be protected from abusive data practices via built-in protections and you should have agency over how data about you is used.
And considering some of these suggestions completely go against current data practices, I doubt any such ratification will happen.
- d23 3y ago> Until any of this is codified it seems to be just a glorified "please don't be bad" oped. Except it’s coming from the White House, not a random op-ed columnist.
- raidicy 3y ago>Except it’s coming from the White House, not a random op-ed columnist. I agree that what I said was pretty dismissive. However considering current attitudes of data and multiple Congressional hearings about uses of public data with seldom satisfactory results, I remain pretty skeptical.
- Mechanical9 3y agoThe actual title is "Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights", so of course it isn't codified yet. If these principles go against current data practices, IMO that seems like all the more reason to push for this to happen.