3 ms·
I thought that was the case before trying Vicuna. I agree that LLaMA and Alpaca are inferior to ChatGPT but I'm really not sure Vicuna is. It even (unfortunate
by jhbadger 4y ago
I thought that was the case before trying Vicuna. I agree that LLaMA and Alpaca are inferior to ChatGPT but I'm really not sure Vicuna is. It even (unfortunately) copies some of ChatGPT's quirks, like getting prudish when asking it to write a love scene ("It would not be appropriate for me to write...")
- nabakin 4y agoI've tried Vicuna but it still seems inferior to ChatGPT imo. Maybe if it was applied to a version of LLaMA with a number of parameters matching GPT-4 but I'm not sure of that either
- whimsicalism 4y agoI admittedly have not interacted with Vicuna yet.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- seydor 4y agois gpt4Xalpaca better?
- int_19h 4y agoIt's definitely inferior once you start giving it non-trivial tasks. the same goes for all instruction- and chat-tuned forks of LLaMA. Maybe that'll be different on larger model sizes; we haven't seen vicuna-30b or 65b yet. But if it really is that easy, I'd expect there to be a lot more commercial offerings on par with ChatGPT already.
- whimsicalism 4y agoWell except you can't legally offer fine-tuned LLaMA as a commercial offering like that.