The best UX would be to have a personal shopper. That's the point of using human language. I can be explicit about the properties I care about and vague about t

The best UX would be to have a personal shopper. That's the point of using human language. I can be explicit about the properties I care about and vague about the properties I don't care about. I'm not going to pay someone $100 to do my grocery shopping or have my father-in-law do it every week, though. An algorithm that can robustly interpret human language can also optimize a shopping cart significantly faster than a human can, based on massively indexed databases. Not to be rude but to highlight my point, why are you trying to infer my ramen flavor preferences from my purchase history? I already explicitly said that I am allergic to beef. That's the whole point. It takes practically no effort for a literate human to speak or write down the criteria that are important to them. It is significantly harder for a computer to correctly interpret it, but that's why it seems like an LLM could help.