12 ms·
Such an odd decision to make from Twitters perspective. On substack, it seems to me the quality of the content there is in part at least due to paying creators
by jabradoodle 4y ago
Such an odd decision to make from Twitters perspective.
On substack, it seems to me the quality of the content there is in part at least due to paying creators based on subscriptions, vs e.g. medium which I believe pays based on how many minutes people spend reading. It seems that business models that are subscription based, and models that promote low quality click bait like content are not mutually exclusive. I hope the short form of social media content doesn't lead to substack loosing what makes it great.
On a side note, I wonder how this post in particular made the front page, I have been expecting it for a few days but none of the posts so gained traction.
- lapcat 4y ago> I wonder how this post in particular made the front page, I have been expecting it for a few days but none of the posts so gained traction. It's already been kicked off.
- rchaud 4y agothere were previous posts on the frontpage this week, didn't last very long. I get the feeling posts related to Musk are weighted down due to how polarizing the comment section becomes.