My main problem with Huberman, and this applies to many in this genre, is that although he is faithfully describing the current research, he doesn't do much to

My main problem with Huberman, and this applies to many in this genre, is that although he is faithfully describing the current research, he doesn't do much to qualify it. What I mean by that is measuring things about people is very very very difficult. Because of this, much of the research published about human subjects is not repeatable. It takes a long time to build evidence in a way that can account for the all confounding non-linear variables involved. He is stating the conclusions of the latest research as if they were proven laws of nature instead of just the research of a potentially flawed study. He's giving far more weight than they are warranted. He might know this intuitively, but the average Joe in his audience does not.