I guess this is an asymmetrical kind of warfare, not simply two AIs duking it out. It's one AI targeting a human with a proposed transaction that results in an

I guess this is an asymmetrical kind of warfare, not simply two AIs duking it out. It's one AI targeting a human with a proposed transaction that results in an absolute loss for the human, and one AI trying to protect against that loss by verifying the plausibility of the transaction in context. Most scams are fairly transparent and rely on wetware failures, right? The anti-scam AI doesn't have to overcome the scam AI, it has to compensate for the emotional responses or unpreparedness of the target. I think that's less of an ask than generating bulletproof scams. I could be completely wrong.