3 ms·
It seems like just using the browser to store forward/backwards state with window.history would be easier than worrying about this server side. Maybe it was a l
by sour-taste 4y ago
It seems like just using the browser to store forward/backwards state with window.history would be easier than worrying about this server side. Maybe it was a legacy site that didn't work well with forward/back or a native app?
- fake-name 4y agoNothing in the article indicates that the client here is a browser. I read it as some service with a custom client application.
- Backslasher 4y agoThis is correct :)