I get the sense here that the author is really more of a pop psychologist than a real anthropologist. These kind of plausible sounding arguments are very convi

I get the sense here that the author is really more of a pop psychologist than a real anthropologist. These kind of plausible sounding arguments are very convincing if you don’t have a background in anthropology- and I don’t, so I’m not going to say he’s wrong, I will just say that based on the tone of the piece, I’m not convinced that he knows much more than I do.