3 ms·
That seems like a weird oversight, since Firefox is normally quite good at rendering large assets. For example, I prefer viewing large SVG images (like those ge
by TechBro8615 4y ago
That seems like a weird oversight, since Firefox is normally quite good at rendering large assets. For example, I prefer viewing large SVG images (like those generated by dependency graphing tools) in Firefox, because unlike Chrome, it allows me to pan and zoom within the image.
- chrisweekly 4y agoMy kneejerk rxn is, this seems more about URL length than asset rendering.
- jfk13 4y agoAs it happens, Firefox 112 has some improvements in this area, although it's still true that handling a multi-megabyte URL will be a bit painful.