3 ms·
Why not just restrict the history to a configurable number of entries? Having like 20-50 is probably enough. It might no be 100% correct but the effort:use rati
by Phelinofist 4y ago
Why not just restrict the history to a configurable number of entries? Having like 20-50 is probably enough. It might no be 100% correct but the effort:use ratio seems good.
- Backslasher 4y agoWe ended up doing that. We decided that while we have to store the stack, it can't hold 20 years of history. > creating a dedicated real stack with self-imposed size limits and reporting.
- scotty79 4y agoWith this escaping of escaped strings they are doubling the number of escapes each time which means they can reach 1GB with just 30 steps.