> Again, that's not what I said. You seem to have a problem with this. It would be interesting to see you actually argue against something other than a strawman

> Again, that's not what I said. You seem to have a problem with this. It would be interesting to see you actually argue against something other than a strawman. Are you capable of that? Yep. In fact, I specifically asked you for your proposal, and you chose to rant about identity politics instead of policy. Which is on brand, I guess. > Going out on a limb here, but are you perchance a real estate agent? Because that would be the most hilarious of conflicts of interest. Nope. The current system for performing real estate transactions is wildly inefficient, rent-seeking, insecure, and I'd love to see it destroyed.