3 ms·
You really have no idea how computers work, and even if I explained how you are mistaken I doubt you'd understand it. If you want to correct that mistake I'd s
by than3 4y ago
You really have no idea how computers work, and even if I explained how you are mistaken I doubt you'd understand it.
If you want to correct that mistake I'd suggest taking a Computer Science Compiler Design course, its the material normally covered in what's known as the dragon book.
> source of true randomness ... This means they are no longer a Turing Machine
Wishful thinking doesn't make it so, I've included an example below, also PRNGs even with random inputs to help with randomness aren't true randomness.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probabilistic_Turing_machine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probabilistic_Turing_machine
- Thiez 4y agoI have a masters degree in computer science. Perhaps it is your argument that doesn't make sense, or is not communicated well?
- than3 4y ago> I have a masters degree in computer science In the interest of not sniping, I'll put it plainly. You clearly do not know what you are supposed to know if that were true. There's no point in me talking to you any further, you've lost all credibility.