The article does not claim empirical evidence but cites someon that has been working and publishing on the topic. I wonder why this should be wrong by any journ

The article does not claim empirical evidence but cites someon that has been working and publishing on the topic. I wonder why this should be wrong by any journaliszic standards. Is there any scientific evidence that the anecdotal evidence by this psychotherapist is wrong? BTW: the German Minister for interior currently actually wants to decriminalise some child porn offenses again because it would mostly target children themselves. I have the feeling that the debate is not out of balance in Germany, but still rather pragmatic.