3 ms·
There is no contradiction between these two statements. They both say the exact same thing: if rice cultivation is in steady state, the amount of CO2 and CH4 in
by xyzzyz 4y ago
There is no contradiction between these two statements. They both say the exact same thing: if rice cultivation is in steady state, the amount of CO2 and CH4 in atmosphere due to it is constant. You next say if we change the steady state, the amount of methane in atmosphere will change, but that again is not a contradiction with what I said.
- littlestymaar 4y agoSo you eventually agree with the statement you disagreed before, that is: > perennial rice may end up reduce GHG emissions substantially. (because that's the starting point of this conversation, and it's the opposite of steady state)