3 ms·
I tried to convince it of an incorrect position about a basic topic but I couldn't continue. It made some very detailed, air-tight arguments (went beyond of my
by jongjong 4y ago
I tried to convince it of an incorrect position about a basic topic but I couldn't continue. It made some very detailed, air-tight arguments (went beyond of my expertise). I would have had to resort to disputing definitions to keep that argument going. With my previous debate, it never touched on definitions; it was all logic-based.
- soared 4y agoI think the point above is that you can debate definitions/etc even without the knowledge and it will still believe you - because the claim is that it’s not really understanding you.